Resumo em Inglês:

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Systematic surveillance of antituberculosis drug resistance allows identification of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Surveillance studies of antituberculosis drug resistance systematically conducted in Cuba for over 15 years have revealed low circulation of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, under 1% in new cases. OBJECTIVE Characterize antituberculosis drug resistance in isolates of M. tuberculosis recovered from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Cuba in 2012–2014. METHODS The nitrate reductase assay was used to test 997 isolates of M. tuberculosis for sensitivity to isoniazid and rifampicin. Isolates identified as multidrug resistant were tested for sensitivity to isoniazid, rifampicin, streptomycin, ethambutol, ofloxacin, amikacin, kanamycin and capreomycin by the proportion method, as well as genetic resistance mutations in rpoB, katG, inhA, gyrA, rrs and embB genes, using GenoType MTBDRplus and MTBDRsl commercial kits. RESULTS Some 95.6% of isolates from new cases and 89.6% of isolates from previously treated patients were sensitive to isoniazid and rifampicin. Multidrug resistance was found in 0.8% of new and 5.2% of previously treated patients, a statistically significant difference. One extensively drug-resistant isolate was detected among previously treated cases. All isolates examined with the molecular method had mutations in the rpoB gene, which is associated with resistance to rifampicin; only seven showed mutations in the katG gene and one in the inhA gene associated with isoniazid resistance. In one isolate, we found mutations in both gyrA and rrs genes, which are associated with resistance to fluoroquinolones and second-line injectable drugs and therefore, extensive resistance. CONCLUSIONS Results corroborate the low frequency of multidrug-resistant and extensively resistant M. tuberculosis strains in Cuba and highlight the need for continuous improvement of surveillance of antituberculosis drug resistance in Cuba.

Resumo em Inglês:

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Health care workers have an increased risk of infection due to occupational Mycobacterium tuberculosis exposure, including multidrug-resistant strains. Health care workers’ risk of developing tuberculosis is greater than that of the general population, whether in low-, intermediate- or high-incidence countries. Adherence to infection control measures (administrative controls, environmental controls, and personal respiratory protection) is essential to reduce risk of disease transmission between suspected tuberculosis patients and health care workers, but for different reasons, both objective and subjective, adherence is low. Identifying the causes of low adherence is a prerequisite to effective programming to reduce risk. OBJECTIVE Identify perceived barriers to adherence to tuberculosis infection control measures among health care workers in the Dominican Republic. METHODS During August 2014, a qualitative study was conducted in two tertiary-level hospitals in different regions of the Dominican Republic. A semi-structured interview guide of nine questions was developed, based on the scientific literature and with consensus of clinical experts. Nine semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of seven physicians (five men, two women) and two baccalaureate nurses (both women) working in the emergency medicine, internal medicine or nursing departments of those institutions. Question topics included clinical experience of M. tuberculosis infection and disease; knowledge of disease transmission and preventive practices; clinical management strategies; and perceptions of effectiveness of directly observed treatment, short-course, and disease coping strategies. RESULTS Perceived barriers were described as: 1) sense of invincibility of health care workers; 2) personal beliefs of health care workers related to direct patient communication; 3) low provider-to-patient ratios in hospitals; 4) absence of tuberculosis isolation units for patients within hospitals; and 5) limited availability of protective masks for health care workers. CONCLUSIONS Our results highlight that perceived barriers at the individual or institutional level may hinder how health care workers understand and comply with preventive strategies to reduce risk of tuberculosis transmission. Addressing these barriers by strengthening infection control program infrastructure and implementing educational interventions within institutions may reduce risk of nosocomial tuberculosis transmission to health care workers.